Inspired by the
New York Times' recent analysis of Manhattan buildings that would not be legal under current zoning, I undertook a far less ambitious analysis of one block of the Wedge neighborhood. By today's zoning standards, on this one block, there are 32 apartments too many. Seven out of 23 buildings have too many dwelling units; these nonconforming buildings range from triplexes to a 23-unit apartment building. This is largely the result of
the neighborhood's 1975 downzoning.
 |
| 2400 block between Colfax and Dupont Ave S. |
 |
| 21 units too many (2446 Colfax) |
This one block isn't unusual in my neighborhood, or the city. By historical standards, Minneapolis is underzoned. This has consequences. As the New York Times points out:
Such limitations can quickly decrease the supply of housing, and most likely drive up rents. If every tenement in the city were reconfigured in these ways, they would be less crowded, but there would also be fewer apartments to go around.
 |
| 18 units too many (26th & Aldrich) |
There's another zoning wrinkle currently working against more affordable multi-family housing: many properties zoned for duplexes (R2) can't become duplexes because of
minimum lot area requirements implemented in the 1990s:
From 1963 to 1994, two-family dwellings in the R2B District required a minimum lot area of 2,500 square feet per dwelling unit. In 1994, a zoning code text amendment increased that minimum lot area to 10,000 square feet. The minimum lot area for two-family dwelling units in the R2 District from 1963 to 1999 was 6,000 square feet per dwelling unit. In 1999, this minimum lot area in the R2 District for a two-family dwelling unit was amended to 12,000 square feet. As noted above, these regulations remain in place today.
This policy is more restrictive than many other cities in Minnesota. But it could change in the near future. City Council Members Lisa Bender and Kevin Reich recently introduced a proposal to cut those minimum lot area requirements in half. This would be a small reform--like
parking reform last year, and the
ADU ordinance in 2014--to bring Minneapolis closer to allowing the historical housing types it's been fighting against for the past 40 years.
As the city updates its comprehensive plan over the next two years, we should take advantage of the opportunity to do much more, to build the kinds of housing that many people say they enjoy: duplexes, triplexes and old apartment buildings that make up much of our city's naturally occurring affordable housing. Buildings that were common 70 or 100 years ago, but that wouldn't be legal to build today.
